Van Gend & Loos oldtimer truck in het spoorwegmuseum tijde… Flickr
The Van Gend & Loos case was triggered by a company that claimed that Dutch customs duties on a product imported from West Germany were in violation of the standstill clause contained in Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome. The clause prohibited Member States from introducing new customs duties on products originating from other Member States, or.
Van Gend & Loos Erwin de Rooy FotografieErwin de Rooy Fotografie
Claes, Monica: Van Gend en Loos, de autonomie van de Europese rechtsorde en het leerstuk van de rechtstreekse werking, Ars aequi 2010 p.122-125 (NL) Szpunar, Maciej: Van Gend en Loos from the perspective of new Member States, 50ème anniversaire de l'arrêt Van Gend en Loos : 1963-2013 : actes du colloque, Luxembourg, 13 mai 2013 (Ed.
Doen Artitec DAF Van Gend & Loos met aanhanger Railhobby
Facts. The claimants, van Gend en Loos, imported chemicals from Western Germany to the Netherlands where they were asked to pay import taxes at Dutch customs, the defendants, which they objected to on the grounds it ran contrary to the European Economic Community's prohibition on inter-State import duties, as per Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome.
An early 20th century Van Gend & Loos delivery truck Van Gend & Loos Wikipedia
Sentencia de 5 de febrero de 1963, NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos contra Administración fiscal holandesa, C-26/62, ECLI:UE:C:1963:1. DOCUMENTOS CONEXOS. Sentencia de 10 de noviembre de 1992, Hansa Fleisch Ernst Mundt GmbH & Co. KG contra Landrat des Kreises Schleswig-Flensburg. C-156/91, ECLI:UE:C:1992:423.
Van Gend en Loos Vintage advertising posters, Old advertisements, Vintage advertisements
Van Gend en Loos is a case with more than a single protagonist—central both to its genesis and its subsequent impact. The very decision by the Dutch court to make a preliminary reference (and the truly breakthrough decision of the lawyers who pleaded the case to request such) was not only procedurally and politically bold but conceptually.
Westzeedijk Goederen van Gend & Loos 1957 Oude trucks, Vrachtwagens, Rotterdam
RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars, a spin-off series in which past contestants return to compete for a spot in the Drag Race "Hall of Fame", premiered in 2012.. As of 2022, ten contestants have competed in more than one season of All Stars.From All Stars 1, Manila Luzon and Latrice Royale, "Team Latrila", returned to All Stars 4 to compete as individual contestants; Jujubee and Alexis Mateo.
1969 Commer "Van Gend & Loos" a photo on Flickriver
The Van Gend & Loos and Costa v ENEL cases, decided on 5 February 1963 and 15 July 1964, respectively, are commonly considered the two building blocks of EU law as an autonomous legal order with direct effect before national courts and primacy over national law. However, there is a third important case, decided between the other two, without.
DAF Van Gend & Loos Vintage Trucks, Old Trucks, Cars Trucks, Train Truck, Road Train, Classic
The 5 February 1963 judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 26/62 N.V. Algemente Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Nederlandse administratie der belastingen (in short 'Van Gend & Loos') is one of the milestones of the Court's jurisprudence and a fundamental building block of EU constitutional law, 'universally celebrated as perhaps the most important case of the Court.
Erfgoed spat van de Van Gend en Loosmuren De Erfgoedstem
Van Gend & Loos was a Dutch distribution company. It was established in 1809, and was purchased by DHL in 2003. History. Van Gend & Loos was established by the Antwerp-based innkeeper and carriage driver Jan-Baptist van Gend. He had married a woman from the Loos family in 1796.
Van Gend & Loosgebouw Helmond Manders Totaal
Van Gend en Loos, a postal and transportation company, imported urea formaldehyde from West Germany to the Netherlands. The authorities charged them a tariff on the import. Van Gend en Loos objected, stating that it was a clear violation of Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome (now replaced by Article 30 TFEU), which stated:
Wie in 1956 met paard en wagen voor Van Gend en Loos? Foto AD.nl
Document 61962CJ0026. Judgment of the Court of 5 February 1963. NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tariefcommissie - Netherlands. Case 26-62. English special edition 1963 00001. ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1963:1. Expand all.
DAF Van Gend & Loos Truck met Rolcontainer Aanhanger met slingermechaniek, jaren 50 Vintage
Varieties of direct effect. In Van Gend en Loos it was decided that a citizen was able to enforce a right granted by European Community legislation against the state - the question of whether rights could be enforced against another citizen was not addressed. In Defrenne v.SABENA (No. 2), the European Court of Justice decided that there were two varieties of direct effect: vertical direct.
Fordson Van Gend & Loos / ATO a photo on Flickriver
The product imported by Van Gend & Loos was, at the time of the entry into force of the Treaty of Rome (1 January 1958), subject to a customs duty charged at 3 %, as it was classified under heading 279-a-2 of the 1947 customs tariff. Under the 1960 tariff, the product was moved to heading 39.01-a-1, to which a higher duty of 8 % was attached.
1938 Paard&Wagen "Van Gend & Loos" a photo on Flickriver
direct effect is needed to ensure the uniform interpretation of the Treaty by national courts. 3 out of 6 member states then in the EEC opposed direct effect in their interventions, indicating that it did not accord with their understanding of the Treaty. Direct and Indirect Effect Cases. Read our concise case summary on Case 26/62 Van Gend en.
Geheugenvanbaarn.nl Jan Daatzelaar bij Van Gend en Loos
Case Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Link; C-26/62: Opinion ECLI:EU:C:1962:42: 12/12/1962: van Gend en Loos
Van Gend & Loos logo, Vector Logo of Van Gend & Loos brand free download (eps, ai, png, cdr) formats
The seminal case of Van Gend & Loos offered the Court an opportunity to proclaim the doctrine of the direct effect of EU law within the legal orders of the Member States. In practice, this means.
